5 
5
6 
5
This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 17th, 2007 at 6:51 am and is filed under Bakers, Flyers, Quakers, Wetas. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
No comments?
How about F you you F’n F!
F’n F? Flying Flyer? That’s really not nice.
Keep your heads up Flyers. I hear you’re missing your enforcer…
Yeah, he got 2 games for receiving.
A stink beatle? A cricket? Ewwww, a roach? Nope. It was a weta. Honest to pete, at the face-off dot, right before the early game last night. What should have been a harbinger for the wetas turned to an omen (everybody follow that … something good to something bad … anyway) as the Bakers overcame at 2-goal deficit. A shorthanded goal in the last 1:30 knotted the score at 5 for the Bakers. Sorry, no fights.
Good game Bakers! We need to get a win Sunday.
matt in goal stood on his head and kept the wetas and the tired D in the game – well done
You won’t get a win Sunday, sorry. You will beg to Moses and the 14ers for mercy!
Updated standings?
how about that kid from the binghamton senators jumping onto the quakers lineup last night. he’s a c+ player right?
Was his name Curci?
i feel like it was this guy, but i didn’t get a real good look.
http://www.binghamtonjrsenators.com/players/player_alongchamps.html
Quit masturbating to hockeydb.com
wow, I think that is actually the dude. The hair is a dead giveaway.
I am pretty sure the illegal player we had was a lefty and that profile says he shoots right… either way he does play within that system.
No, that is him.
Check out the action shots here:
http://www.bowe.smugmug.com/gallery/2228994#116167426
I remember the skates. …and the hair.
man, you guys don’t get it. well, i’m glad you won. we all needed more proof that cheating pays.